How it works
Tested, not just written.What happens to your response — and what doesn’t get released.
This page explains what the testing does, why it is independent, and what Quadratic does not do. The detail of how the tests are built is deliberately not on this page.
Is this just a chatbot in a suit?
No. A general chatbot is one model in one conversation. Quadratic is a structured review process built for one specific job: the worker-side response to a PIP, show-cause letter, or allegation letter, under Australian employment law.
A general chatbot
- One model produces one fluent answer.
- No-one verifies the legal references it cites.
- It does not read its own draft the way a hostile employer would.
- It can sound confident while being wrong.
- It does not know Australian employment-law context unless you describe it.
Quadratic
- Your response is scrutinised by something that did not write it.
- Claims are verified against the Fair Work Act and Fair Work Commission decisions.
- The draft is read from a hostile employer’s perspective before it reaches you.
- If a verification can’t be completed, the document is held back — not guessed.
- Every released document discloses that AI was used.
General chatbots are useful tools. Preparing a written response that your employer or the Commission will read against you is a different job, with different stakes.
What happens to your response
These are the jobs the review process does — described by what you get, not by how it’s built.
Every concern answered
Your employer’s letter is read and each specific concern or allegation in it is identified. The response addresses each point directly, drawing on the factual context you provide.
Risk it reduces: missing an allegation — which can be treated as conceding that point.
Grounded in the Fair Work Act
Every legal claim in the draft is verified against the Fair Work Act and relevant Fair Work Commission decisions. References that are weak, wrong, or unsupported are corrected before the document moves forward.
Risk it reduces: citing law that does not say what the draft claims it says.
Read the way a hostile employer would read it
The draft is read from the perspective of someone who wants to use it against you — your employer, their legal team, or the Commission. Language that could be misread, quoted out of context, or turned against you is removed or strengthened.
Risk it reduces: handing management a polished sentence they can quote back at you.
Independently reviewed before release
The whole document is read end to end — for internal consistency, completeness, and alignment with Fair Work Commission procedural expectations. It is only released when it passes.
Risk it reduces: a document that passes piece by piece but does not hold together as a whole.
Held back, not guessed
If any test can’t be completed, your document is held back rather than released. You never receive a document that looked finished but was never vetted.
Risk it reduces: a confident-sounding document that nothing actually verified.
Rendered as a .docx — built the same way every time, with the generative-AI disclosure embedded.
Why the testing is independent
The part of Quadratic that writes your response is never the part that tests it. Nothing marks its own homework. Each review builds on verified work — it does not start again from scratch.
The document you receive has been independently tested, not just written.
How that independence works is proprietary, and it stays under the hood.
What the system tests
- Legal accuracy
- Claims are verified against the Fair Work Act and relevant case decisions before they appear in your response.
- Procedural compliance
- The response follows the procedural expectations of the Fair Work Commission for the document type you submitted.
- Allegation coverage
- Every specific concern or allegation in your employer’s letter receives a direct response. Nothing is left unanswered.
- Weak points an employer could use
- Language that could be quoted against you, taken out of context, or misread is identified and revised.
- Internal consistency
- The final document does not contradict itself and presents a coherent position throughout.
What Quadratic does not do
Being clear about limitations is part of how we earn trust.
It does not provide legal advice. The response is produced by an automated system, not a lawyer, and is not a substitute for independent legal advice.
It is not a law firm, and using it does not create a lawyer–client relationship.
It does not promise outcomes. A well-prepared response can strengthen your position, but no specific result from your employer or the Fair Work Commission can be guaranteed.
It does not detect, score, or judge whether you, your employer, or anyone else used AI to write a document. Quadratic prepares your response; it does not adjudicate authorship.
It does not prepare Fair Work Commission applications. It produces a written response to your employer’s document only.
It does not keep your documents indefinitely. Files and outputs are kept up to 90 days during the private pilot, then permanently deleted.
Important. This system uses AI to produce and test your response. It is designed to improve the quality and defensibility of your response, but it is not infallible. Read your response carefully before submitting it. If your matter may proceed to the Fair Work Commission, consider having a lawyer or union representative review it first.
Interested in the private pilot?
Request pilot accessFree during private pilot · $199 per document at launch.